![]()
Visitors Since January 16 2011
Fire Your Wife
& No Marriage ebooks
Marriage -- THE
starting place for exploring marriage and marriage issues
Top Ten
Reasons Why American Women Suck
If you do not want to deal with the following 'Marriage
Strike' than you must stay away
from American, Australian women and stick to women from Africa, Asia, Europe,
and Latin America.
An American (US born women) woman with an Italian born
mother told me that 90 percent of Australian & American women are
crap. She became a naturalized Australian citizen before she moved back
the United States.
There are some good American women, like the Hispanic
(Spanish speaking community), Michelle Obama and US diplomats that work for the
US State department. They are
submissive women and are still raised in the same close not family structure of
the 1950’s.
The only reason why American women want to have sex is in
order to get 18 years of court ordered child support and use 9/10 of it on them
selves.
Lawyers say that it is better to only have a low paying job, and have a child support order of only, $15.00 a month that it is to have a high paying job, and have a child support order of $250,000.00 a month that will not lower if you voluntary drop to your income $1,000.00 a month. This is because child support will be high than your income and you could go to jail lose your job, have no income and have a debt that can never be paid of.
Only if the
father lives in Australia, Canada, and the Untied States, can a mother get
child support enforced by handling the father as a criminal, while at the same
time deny him his parental rights. The same goes for national
of those countries who have sex in other countries that have a child support
treaty. Click here for the list of US Federal and State
child support treaties. Click here for an example with Germany.
In most countries in the world the mother cannot get child support enforced, if
she is not willing to give the father equal parenting time.
Update: Variations of Marriage Strike
Due to the fear of predicaments around marriage and divorce, there are also
other life style behaviors closely associated with Marriage Strike.
- Birth Strike. In some jurisdictions (ie Canada), pregnancy/birth automatically
grant your girlfriend the same legal status as a wife. Consequently, men
practice Birth Strike with their romantic partner, refusing to allow pregnancy.
- Breakup. In some jurisdictions, prolonged co-habitation result in automatic
recognition of marital status for legal purposes. Some men routinely breakup to
avoid such status. Although it is unclear if they simply enjoy "playing
women".
- Expatriation. Dissatisfied by the perceived corruption of the local female
population, some men intentionally marry women not native to his nation. Some
travel to another country for marriage, some marry foreigners on working visa.
While this is not a strike to marriage, it is a boycott against the domestic
supply of women.
Courtesy: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=149553
A 'Marriage Strike' Emerges As Men Decide Not To Risk
Loss
The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | July 5, 2002 | Glenn Sacks
and Dianna Thompson
Posted on Saturday, July 06, 2002 8:00:19 AM by
buccaneer81
A 'marriage strike' emerges as men decide not to risk
loss
By Glenn Sacks and Dianna Thompson
Katherine is attractive, successful, witty, and educated.
She also can't find a husband. Why? Because most of the men this
thirtysomething software analyst dates do not want to get married. These men
have Peter Pan syndrome: They refuse to commit, refuse to settle down, and
refuse to "grow up."
However, given the family court policies and divorce
trends of today, Peter Pan is no naive boy, but instead a wise man.
"Why should I get married and have kids when I could
lose those kids and most of what I've worked for at a moment's notice?"
asks Dan, a 31-year-old power plant technician who says he will never marry.
"I've seen it happen to many of my friends. I know
guys who came home one day to an empty house or apartment - wife gone, kids
gone. They never saw it coming. Some of them were never able to see their kids
regularly again."
Census figures suggest that the marriage rate in the
United States has dipped 40 percent during the last four decades to its lowest
point since the rate was measured. There are many plausible explanations for
this trend, but one of the least mentioned is that American men, in the face of
a family court system hopelessly stacked against them, have subconsciously
launched a "marriage strike."
It is not difficult to see why. Let's say that Dan defies
Peter Pan, marries Katherine, and has two children. There is a 50 percent
likelihood that this marriage will end in divorce within eight years, and if it
does, the odds are 2-1 it will be Katherine, not Dan, who initiates the
divorce. It may not matter that Dan was a decent husband. Studies show that few
divorces are initiated over abuse or because the man has already abandoned the
family. Nor is adultery cited as a factor by divorcing women appreciably more
than by divorcing men.
While the courts may grant Dan and Katherine joint legal
custody, the odds are overwhelming that it is Katherine, not Dan, who will win
physical custody. Overnight, Dan, accustomed to seeing his kids every day and
being an integral part of their lives, will become a "14 percent dad"
- a father who is allowed to spend only one out of every seven days with his
own children.
Once Katherine and Dan are divorced, odds are at least
even that Katherine will interfere with Dan's visitation rights.
Three-quarters of divorced men surveyed say their
ex-wives have interfered with their visitation, and 40 percent of mothers
studied admitted that they had done so, and that they had generally acted out
of spite or in order to punish their exes.
Katherine will keep the house and most of the couple's
assets. Dan will need to set up a new residence and pay at least a third of his
take-home pay to Katherine in child support.
As bad as all of this is, it would still make Dan one of
the lucky ones. After all, he could be one of those fathers who cannot see his
children at all because his ex has made a false accusation of domestic
violence, child abuse, or child molestation. Or a father who can only see his
own children under supervised visitation or in nightmarish visitation centers
where dads are treated like criminals.
He could be one of those fathers whose ex has moved their
children hundreds or thousands of miles away, in violation of court orders,
which courts often do not enforce. He could be one of those fathers who tears
up his life and career again and again in order to follow his children, only to
have his ex-wife continually move them.
He could be one of the fathers who has lost his job, seen
his income drop, or suffered a disabling injury, only to have child support
arrearages and interest pile up to create a mountain of debt which he could
never hope to pay off. Or a father who is forced to pay 70 percent or 80
percent of his income in child support because the court has imputed an
unrealistic income to him. Or a dad who suffers from one of the child support
enforcement system's endless and difficult to correct errors, or who is jailed
because he cannot keep up with his payments. Or a dad who reaches old age
impoverished because he lost everything he had in a divorce when he was
middle-aged and did not have the time and the opportunity to earn it back.
"It's a shame," Dan says. "I always wanted
to be a father and have a family. But unless the laws change and give fathers
the same right to be a part of their children's lives as mothers have, it just
isn't worth the risk."
Courtesy: http://www.glennsacks.com/have_antifather_family.htm
Section 51.70 (a) (8) of Title 22 of the Code of Federal
Regulations states, in part, that if you are certified to Passport Services by
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to be in arrears of
child support payments in excess of $2,500, you are ineligible to receive a U.S.
passport. If this applies to you, Passport Services strongly recommends that
you contact the appropriate State child support enforcement agency to make
payment arrangements before applying for a passport.
The divorce rate for American men who marry American
women: 57% (officially). But since the figures from several states (including California)
are excluded, the true national divorce rate is likely
closer to 65%. The divorce rate in California is over 70%.
The divorce rate for American men who marry foreign women: approximately 20%.
So you can marry an American woman and have a close to two-thirds chance of
getting divorced, or you can marry a foreign woman and have at least a 75%
chance of success.